News in English

...now browsing by category

 

Go, Tony, go…?

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

Who will be our pan-European president?

If you still think it will be Tony Blair, you should read Jean Quatremer’s latest blog entry.  It’s a nicely written summary of the quest for the president of the European Council up to this day.

It seems that the race, described two weeks ago by The Economist as “a contest between Tony Blair and everyone else”, is set to become a contest between everyone but Tony Blair… In fact, Nicolas Sarkozy, Blair’s most fervent supporter until now, recently admitted that the British opt-out from the Euro might be an obstacle on Blair’s way to EU presidency. More pronounced, however, is the criticism voiced by the Benelux countries and Germany’s CDU members… They don’t want Blair because the UK is not sufficiently anchored in European structures or/and because they didn’t like the way the British government acted in the past on certain EU initiatives and policies… Also, small member states would generally prefer a candidate from a small member state who would preserve the Commission’s pivotal role and prevent the big MS from devouring the rest in the intergovernmental institution the Council is.

So how to reconcile Europe’s willingness to be represented by a face recognizable in Beijing and Washington with the individual motivations of the member states?

The Economist  suggested that the competition is actually going on between Tony Blair and some “Euro-pygmies” (Mr. Juncker and Mr. Balkenende, for instance). We attempted a comparison between these three figures (see below). Feel free to add your own ++ and — below.

But as the NRC Handelsblad noted, as long as the EU decision making is comparable to a henhouse, it doesn’t matter that much what kind of country its president comes from…

Comparison_blog

Lisbon treaty … where do we stand, where do we go?

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

Friday 25th, Brussels: « After the parliamentary approval of the Treaty on May 23, 2008, the judgment of the Constitutional Court on June 30, 2009, and the subsequent debate and adoption of the national accompanying legislation, I would like to thank Germany for its European commitment and constant support of the treaty. » saying President Barroso after Germany has ratified the Lisbon Treaty, two days after President Köhler signed the legislation.

A. Merkel, J. M. Barroso, welt.de

A. Merkel, J. M. Barroso, welt.de

Saturday 26th, Dublin, The Sunday Business Post’s poll revealed that 55% of voters are in favor of the Lisbon Treaty, down seven points since the last poll two weeks ago, 27% were against the treaty, up four points, while 18% were undecided, unchanged from the previous poll. But nothing to worry about, since the “yes” voters still remain comfortably ahead of the “no” voters.

Counting on my fingers, Germany: done, Ireland: on a good way, Poland: said would ratify as soon as Ireland votes yes…

And once again Barosso repeating “I (…) stress the importance of completing the ratification process of the Lisbon Treaty in all Member States this autumn”.

Sounds like everything’s going fine in Neverland…

But, there are growing fears in the European Union. Indeed, some European Commission officials believe that Czech President Vaclav Klaus will delay the signing of the EU reform Lisbon treaty by weeks or months even if the treaty was approved by the Czech parliament and endorsed by the Czech Constitutional Court.

The French newspaper Libération says that Klaus is waiting for the election victory of the British Conservatives whose leader David Cameron has promised to call a referendum on the Lisbon treaty if it did not take force before in the meantime. Libération points to the letter Cameron sent to Klaus and says if the treaty were rejected in a British referendum it would mean its definitive end.

Why Barroso-bashing serves EU democracy

Friday, September 18th, 2009

This week, José Manuel Durão Barroso, the former and now also future President of the EU Commission, has been reelected with a narrow absolute majority vote in the European Parliament. But his reappointment has been far from uncontroversial: Not only did four major political groups in the Parliament, namely the Socialists, Liberals, the Greens and the Leftists, openly refuse to endorse Barroso, but he eventually also depended on the votes from the eurosceptic group – what an irony, Mr President!

So did, at the end of the day, all the acrimonious debates on the Portuguese’s reelection in times of economic crisis and unsolved climate issues turn out to be vain? Not exactly! The lively debate, discussed not only in Brussels’

Barroso during the vote in the European Parliament (Source: http://www.presstv.ir)

Barroso during the vote in the European Parliament (Source: http://www.presstv.ir)

more or less closed political circles but also broadely covered by the media all over Europe and numerous blogs on the net, did the EU a favour by enhancing its democratic profile. No – did Mr Barroso’s fellow-conservatives say: Quite the opposite, it paralysed the EU at a crucial moment. But this is nothing but disguised campaigning.

From an impartial point of view, the whole nomination and reelection process had two merits: First, it spoiled the Member States’ plan to discretely reappoint the weak President at the head of the Commission in order to preserve their own influence in EU decision-making. Secondly, it aroused a broad democratic debate within and outside the institutions that partly created what the EU bitterly needs: a continent-wide public sphere where citizens, media and politicians discuss key decisions. This summer, a lot of people all over Europe finally saw that the EU executive is not the stooge of the Member States, but a political leader who needs a democratic majority to be elected. That’s quite a step forward rather than an impediment for the functioning of the EU.

She’s young – but doesn’t need the money

Saturday, August 1st, 2009

Emilie Turunen (Source: website of The Greens/EFA)

Emilie Turunen (Source: website of The Greens/EFA)

A monthly salary of 7 400 EUR, personal assistants and a nice office on the eighth floor of a big office building. Not bad at the age of only 25 years.

I am not talking about a movie star or an investment banker. I am talking about Emilie Turunen, the youngest Member of the new European Parliament. Since July, she represents the Danish “Socialistisk Folkeparti “, belonging to the parliamentary group The Greens / EFA in the European Parliament.

For me, being of the same age, this is quite a lot of power, money, and responsibility for a young lady. But is that a bad thing? Should we rather elect more experienced people to represent our ideas effectively? I don’t believe so. Although it might be a bit surprising at first sight, a more representative composition of the Parliament in terms of age and experience helps European politics to be closer to young people’s lives. In my eyes, the question should rather be: Why is she such an exception? Politics is not only about experience but also about choices, preferences and dreams. And I believe she may be more apt to fulfill that job for my generation than any more experienced politician. And you, what do you think about youngsters in (EU) politics?

Superpower vs. fake vodka

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

A Polish candidate in the EP elections, Bogusław Sonik, decided to follow Mr. Obama’s and Mr. Sarkozy’s example by going on-line during his campaign. Surprise, surprise: Mr. Sonik posted some clips on the video-sharing website… YouTube (ever heard of it…?).

Sure, the use of YouTube, Facebook, MySpace, etc. is becoming common practice when it comes to conducting political campaigns. However, we can’t deny that candidates’ YouTube clips are always unique (even if they’re boring…).

What you are about to see, dear readers, is an example of a pioneering super-hero-based EP campaign. Get some popcorn and set your eyes on Supersonic Crystalman, your powerful voice in Europe!

Supersonic Crystalman seems to be against pollution, fake vodka and EU-related ignorance. We have to confess in all sincerity that we actually share all these concerns with Mr. Sonic Sonik. Too bad we won’t be able to cast our ballots for this candidate in the June elections. Nevertheless, he’ll remain our favourite super-EP candidate.

Of course, we’ll scrutinize the Brussels sky if he makes it into the EP.

PS: Here’s one of Mr. Sonik’s favourite clips (also worth watching):

Don’t vote or…

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

Don’t vote!

If you vote, others won’t be able to chose for you
You’re a nice person, you trust people and people certainly know what’s good for you. Just let them pick some decent politicians… You’ll feel good.
*
*
*
*
If you vote, it will look as if you feel responsible for what’s going on in Europe. You certainly don’t want to feel responsible, do you? Nooooooooooooo, get me the remote control!!
*
*
*
*
If you vote, the EU parliament will have more legitimacy. More what? Legitimacy, it means that the EP can make laws because people want them to make laws…

But it’s always easier to say they are crap because they were elected by 30% of the people. Too bad for them, buhahahahahahaha!
*
*
*
*
So stay at home, watch a movie, be happy… or keep complaining.

The pic we used has the fancy name
“The European institutions: the European Parliament – the voice of the people”

It belongs to the EC and can be downloaded from here:
http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/download/photo_download_en.cfm?id=14030&type=4

Moving street target

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

There are various reasons why we decided to have a blog on Europe, sorry… on the EU. We thought that writing a blog must be a cool thing. And it’s cool indeed! “Writing to the world” corresponds more or less to our paternalistic aspirations. In fact, teaching ignorant people how the EU works makes us feel intelligent.

Nah, we actually don’t know how it works: nobody does! But we felt we could share a few clever thoughts with you. In fact, we know some stuff ‘cause, at the end, we’re studying in the capital of Europe and it happens that some Euro-technocrats give us courses. Yes, they do give us courses! As if they were not getting enough shekels, man! Perhaps, they need to teach stuff in order to feel useful. Just kidding, my dearest professors. I appreciate your hmmm… hard work.

More seriously, our idea was to make “uninterested people from the street” the blog’s  main target group. You know, Europe is fascinating but – sorry but I love this useful expression – people from the street (ALL THESE POOR PEOPLE WALKING PURPOSELESS IN THE STREETS OF THEIR CITIES, TOWNS AND VILLAGES) just don’t know how enthralling Europe is. They simply don’t know. As Jean-Claude Van Damme, Belgium’s most famous philosopher, would say: ils savent pas, les pauvres, they are not aware. Ignorance irritates us.

And we were sure that the under-informed Mr. Smith and Mme Dupont from the street would be delighted if they had a chance to read our blog. Instead of using their soles walking aimlessly from one corner of their street to the other, Mr. & Mme should get a seat, grab a MacBook and learn how Europe works. Yes, we were hoping they would finally leave their avenues, boulevards and cul-de-sac, go home, type www.nicetomeeteu.com and let the EU imbue their mind.

There are actually so many people in the streets who don’t know how diverting and interesting Europe is. As you can see, our target group is quite large. Here’s where our main problem pops up: the marketing issue. We actually can’t really reach the guy in the street. The only way people find our blog is through Google (via tags) or YouTube. The rest is family, friends, friends’ friends, friends’ friends’ friends, etc… Believe us or not, but we have good stats. A relatively high number of internet users visit our site daily but we kind of know these are no “people from the street”. I suppose they are EU lovers. Yep, we’re mostly getting EU sweethearts here! Why is it so?

Like all political parties, EUTube and even Barack Obama, nicetomeeteu.com is confronted with the same notable communication problem: the principle of selective exposure. It means that people will always tend to go to websites that contain information they’re already familiar with. You’ll avoid visiting sites that will say something that doesn’t really correspond to your expectations, opinions or knowledge. That’s why a Europhobe with some self-esteem won’t bother watching YouTube clips explaining EU policies. He simply knows this is “EU propaganda”. At the same time, an eager “defender of the EU” will find it difficult to devote a couple of minutes to listen to someone complaining about the “undemocratic character of the EU”.

So what about us? We can’t do anything about the fact that people are very limited in the choice of their information sources. This is why I’ll suggest to my co-editors either to stop being too idealistic and merely concentrate on the “EU-veterans” or to start a street campaign for our blog. In fact, if people are not eager to spot a new information source, the source should spot them. The campaign could involve a BBQ and an ukulele concert on the Schuman round-about (which is in the middle of the European district), coupled with a distribution of free water and flyers containing the internet address of the blog. Sounds compelling.

And how about making a nice YouTube vid of the street campaign involving our readers? If you live nearby Brussels, send us an e-mail to contact@nicetomeeteu.com with your name, age, phone number and a short motivation letter stating why you would like to take part in the pioneering marketing campaign in the streets of Brussels. You’re also encouraged to attach a picture to the e-mail. It’s not that we won’t take you if you’re ugly. You might simply do another job, not involving your face being visible in the clip. The applications will go through a harsh selection procedure consisting in the members of the panel (blog editors) randomly choosing the most suitable solicitations. Financial contributions are also very welcome.

We’ll keep you posted. For the time being, enjoy our blog and feel free to share your thoughts with us.

[The above pic belongs to the EC and can be downloaded for free from here: http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/photo/photo_thematic_en.cfm?id=012491]

A president with balls?

Saturday, March 21st, 2009

There is no doubt that José Manuel Durão Barroso will remain the European Commission’s president for a 2nd term. As European newspapers report, political leaders of most EU members states and the biggest political families sitting in the European Parliament are ok with Barroso keeping the job.

Is Mr. Barroso the president we need? Does he have the charisma Europe needs in times of political and economic crisis? Did he show the right abilities one needs to cope with difficult situations? What do Europeans think when they see Barroso’s face? Who remembers the president’s successes?

It’s cruel to say but Barroso’s image is mostly linked to the three failed referenda. Fiasco in France, defeat in the Netherlands, flop in Ireland and resulting clumsy struggle for Europe (‘s face?). Why not get some fresh air? Why not pick a young “European statesman” à la Delors?

Right, too late for such a proposal!

Still, having a real emperor also sounds like a cool thing…

The picture comes from the EC Audiovisual Service: http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/home/index_en.cfm

Brussel, ma belle!

Monday, March 16th, 2009

A tourist talking to a local in Brussels:

- Little boy, does it always rain in your country?

- I don’t know, sir, I’m only eleven.

This joke tells a lot about the weather in Belgium. Perhaps it doesn’t rain that much in this country, but the weather here is often gray, cloudy, gloomy, sunless. Yes, we often have BAD weather in Brussels, dude. Foolish Europhiles that we are, we’re waiting for a directive that would change this. No decisions or recommendations, please, these are for pussies. We want a weather directive fixing once and for all the good weather in Belgium (or at least in Brussels!). A regulation would actually also do it.

It reminds me of a news item I’d read about two years ago. It was about an announcement in the Polish parliament. The thing was read to the Polish MP’s and stated that parliamentarians were welcome to attend a special Mass where they would pray for rain (in was a period of drought in Poland).

I don’t know if the attendance was high and whether the initiative was bore any fruit but we definitely should use this method in Brussels.  Let’s send a solemn letter to the European Parliament, the Commission and all the other Brussels-based EU institution asking their workers to make a break, gather for an hour on the Place Robert Schuman and join their spiritual forces in an effort to bring some sun to our beloved city. (No doubt Barroso and Fischer Boel will be the best candidates to preside the shamanic rituals.) The EC complains that people don’t realise how Europe influences their daily life. Just get us some sun and you’ll see Eurobarometer indicators skyrocketing!

Here’s the clip with the communiqué about the Mass for rain:

Will sexy clips save the EU?

Friday, March 13th, 2009

Our NiceToMeetEU-team has the honour to write an article for the next issue of the Brussels-based magazine “Eyes on Europe”. The article is to be published soon. As promised in the article, we’re placing here the videos which inspired our contribution.

The most viewed video on Eutube:

The version classified not suitable for minors by Eutube’s users:

The pictures have been taken from the first movie presented above.